It is always an emotional response.
It is always between myself and myself and another person
– this is what it boils down to.
I am not interested in the technique of photography or of camera.
I am not interested in light. What I want is light in which the subject
is free to move in any way without falling into an ugly light.
So that I can get to them, to the expression they make, so that
they are free to do or express something which is the way I feel.
The camera is most in the way.
If I could do what I want with my eyes alone, I would be happy.
Then when I get it on paper, on the negative, if there was something
in the eyes when I took the picture, then when I look at the print,
there are things that I can do to emphasize that.
But when I’m used to an approach,it becomes like a person
that I have no response to.
The approach to the print is like the approach to the sitter.
Certain qualities in the print say what I mean.
I hate photographs, most photographs. I cannot take a picture
of something I have not known and experienced myself,
because I do not know what is going on.
The photograph is not reportage.
I do not believe that something reports itself in a photograph.
It is redrawn; it is something I am saying.
I'm amazed at how immediate these Titans of Media become when someone who listens turns down the noise and the person comes out of the frame.
AntwortenLöschenThank you.